#Libreoffice vs openoffice powerpoint full#
#Libreoffice vs openoffice powerpoint android#
#Libreoffice vs openoffice powerpoint windows#

WPS does support Excel VBA in the paid version, so that could come in handy, but if users are VBA addicts they're better off with Excel offline. WPS is quite good but not as good as Onlyoffice. Switching is so quick you can easily test a couple of docs/sheets/presentations.īefore Onlyoffice came along I used WPS/Kingsoft office when Libreoffice could not hack it. They are a freemium based nextcloud provider and in their Cloud Console you can select OnlyOffice or Collabora for editing. you can try nextcloud+onlyoffice & Collabora at. Onlyoffice is my clear winner in this list of fat-client-based editors and completely blows the others out of the water as web-based office-software.ītw.

Having said that: the desktopeditors are multi-platform (win, mac, linux & crostini Chromebooks) and I find them brilliant.

#Libreoffice vs openoffice powerpoint android#

At the time of writing the android client cannot even edit offline files (so you need to be online, which makes on wonder why not simply use the web-based client?). Onlyoffice is web-services based and sees the desktopeditors as a useful added possibility.

#Libreoffice vs openoffice powerpoint full#

If you want work done, you'll invariably find you'll need the full fat-client installs. MS-Office/MS-Online Office and Libreoffice/Collabora are device centric packages that see the online parts as disabled cousins. Onlyoffice does allow me to edit docx on Chromebook and Manajro without the othesrs noticing it. The others would notice I was the odd one out, occasionally. etc.).įor my work I can say that Libreoffice did not have a level of compatibility that allowed me to use it when was part of a docx editing chain. Macros removed, base removed, data-integration removed (i.e. Unlike Onlyoffice (which was designed web-based) Collabora is basically a web-based UI covering the fat-client software, with all the fat-client flexibilities removed.

Macros can be programmed in javasctipt uing an API and can be run online and offline (desktopeditors has the same macro-processor as the online version)Ĭollabora is Libreoffice's web-version that is supposed to compete with online MS-office and other competitors. So Nextcloud+Onlyoffice can come quite close to G Drive. Although Onlyoffice lacks the synching capablities of G-drive and Zoho, it does allow using sync-clients with standards-based solutions to syn. Onlyoffice is webservices centric and has an added offline documenteditor. Libreoffice and Openoffice are device-centric solutions. With Onlyoffice I can edit sensitive docxs on Manjaro or ChromeOS boxes without breaking noncloud policies, and I can edit docxs in my gdrive/onedrive/webdav that are too complex to convert. I found that docx editing kept me locked into having to have MS-stuff, until I discovered Onlyoffice. (chromebooks and linux with GApps/G Suite and Zoho/Onlyoffice). Subsequently I went Cloud and replaced most apps with cloud-alternatives that sync user-data and config-data I switched to Linux years ago by replacing my win apps with multi-platform alternatives first (ie-> firefox, outlook->thunderbird, MS Office-> Openoffice later libreoffice). WPS Office, Softmaker Office and Only Office all have a UI much more closely aligned to Microsoft's office interface If I am being truthful, the primary reason I don't use LO(or OO) is that I have to work in Microsoft Office at work and I find it difficult to transition back and forth.

#Libreoffice vs openoffice powerpoint windows#

Honestly, the longer I use Linux as my full-time desktop, the less often I open my Windows vm. I suppose I would if I ever found I needed something that could only be done that way. I have never been tempted to use Microsoft Office in a vm. I also use a combination of Only Office, Libre Office and Microsoft Office Online when appropriate. My primary choice is Softmaker Office which I use most of the time. Some people prefer to avoid those products.įor me personally, I find that I need a mix of tools to get the job done.

Open Source - Many of the viable office suites for Linux, while free, are actually commercial products.

Since office suites are used a lot of different ways, you might not notice or care about certain features or tools but others might not have the same needs.

Functionality - In terms of breadth of functionality, LO and OO have substantially more than most of the other Linux office suites.

While OO has picked up the pieces in the last few years, LO has already become the dominant open source office suite. When Open Office began to lose direction, the LO fork was created and picked up the pieces.

History - For a long-time, Open Office was the only real quality open source office suite.

Why LO is the de-facto suite installed in ML, actually in any linux?